Warning for non-U.S. citizens about medical and recreational marijuana

As of December 6, 2018, 32 states plus the District of Colombia and Puerto Rico, have legalized medical marijuana. Ten states, including Michigan, have legalized marijuana for recreational purposes, too.

People who are not U.S. citizens may believe that using marijuana in Michigan—whether for recreational or medical use—is permissible and will not affect their immigration status. Unfortunately, that is wrong!! It is still a federal offense to possess marijuana even if, under state law, it is legal for medical or recreational purposes.

Call to Action: Support Saving the Flores Settlement Agreement

By: 
Rebeca Ontiveros-Chavez

I’m an attorney at the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center (MIRC). I represent children and youth who are in deportation proceedings and metro Detroit area residents on a variety of immigration matters. Over the past year alone, MIRC has represented approximately 280 children in immigration matters as a part of the Unaccompanied Minors program.

Like all the children I represent, I am an immigrant. I immigrated to the United States when I was a toddler. I became eligible to apply to become a permanent resident and eventually became a United States Citizen. Undoubtedly, my work is a life calling and a dream come true. I do this work because of my personal story and because I realize how incredibly lucky I’ve been. And it wasn’t because of anything special that I did. My personal experience helps me relate and connect to the people I serve. I make sure that I take appropriate care to develop their cases and seeing me hopefully inspires them to continue hoping for a better future.

Today, I need your help to demand that all children are protected. On September 7, 2018, the administration published a Notice of Public Rulemaking (NPRM). With this NPRM, the administration is pursuing the indefinite incarceration of vulnerable children and families thereby seeking to end the Flores Settlement Agreement (FSA). The FSA has been in place for decades. It is designed to protect the well-being and basic rights of children in the custody of the federal government, including people seeking asylum. It does so by setting basic standards of care and prevents the U.S. from detaining children indefinitely in prison-like conditions. The administration’s proposal would transform the child welfare protections of the FSA and punishes children and their families seeking protection in the United States.

We urge organizations to submit robust comments detailing their opposition to the proposed rule and we will commit to supporting organizations in those efforts as we have done for the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC). We are grateful that the MCRC continues to defend the civil rights of immigrant children and their families. In our own comment, we partnered with the National Association of Social Workers - Michigan Chapter to express our strong opposition to the proposed rule to amend regulations relating to the apprehension, processing, care, custody, and release of children. We believe the proposed rule undermines the purpose underlying the FSA. Rather than advancing the child welfare principles for immigrant children seeking protection in the United States, the proposed rule expands the authority of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to jail families in impoverished conditions and dismantles established protections for immigrant children in DHS and Health and Human Services custody.

Anyone can submit a comment. Please visit www.stopfamilydetention.org to directly submit a short, individual comment rejecting the administration’s latest cruel attack on immigrant families. A child is a child no matter what country they are born in. A child is a child even when they cross the border. And our children deserve to be safe.

The deadline to submit a comment is Tuesday, November 6th.

Categories: 
We Are MIRC

Front Door Project Releases Needs Assessment for SE Michigan

The Michigan Immigrant Rights Center (MIRC) is pleased to release its report on immigration legal needs in Southeast Michigan. The report was compiled using data from interviews and evaluations with frontline legal service providers across Southeast Michigan between May and June 2018. Funding for this report, along with an array of comprehensive legal services focused on Southeast Michigan, comes from The Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan and The Kresge Foundation.

Fighting for Francis Anwana

By: 
Tania Morris Díaz

I joined the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center in March of this year as part of their newest program to expand legal services to the Detroit Metro area. The past six months have been filled with challenges and lessons learned. However, the past few weeks alone have been especially challenging with the case of Francis Anwana.

 Many are familiar with his story by now. Francis was born deaf in Nigeria. He was completely unable to communicate up until he was thirteen years old and came to the U.S. on a student visa to study American Sign Language (ASL). Because he overstayed his visa, he was ultimately put in deportation proceedings and has been checking in with ICE for the past decade. In September, ICE suddenly gave Francis five days to return to Nigeria. His advocates immediately went into action to prevent that from happening.

The first time I met Francis, we were alone in a room waiting for an interpreter. He flashed his signature smile and I smiled back. He then signed something to me and I awkwardly tried to signal my lack of understanding. He chuckled and took my hand with his and with the other began signing. An ASL speaker came into the room and let me know he was signing “work?” The question was if I was there working. I then, through the interpreter, explained my role. Every time I would see Francis, he would smile at me and sign and every time I would clumsily sign whatever I had just learned. Through him, I’ve learned how to sign “hearing,” “thank you,” “yes,” “no,” “Francis” and “T” for Tania.

Thanks to the help of many advocates, friends, journalists, co-workers, and countless others, Francis will be able to stay in the U.S. for another year while we continue to fight for him to have legal status. Currently, there is a private bill that, if passed, would allow Francis to be a lawful permanent resident.  I urge any supporters to call your reps to support Rep. Dan Kildee's Bill to make Francis a lawful permanent resident. It is H.R. 6829: For the relief of Francis Anwana.

The last time I saw Francis and told him the most recent news about him staying for a year, I learned how to sign “celebrate.” The battle continues and I’m hopeful that by the end of this I’ll learn how to sign “citizen.”

Categories: 
We Are MIRC

My Mother is from Mexico

By: 
Tania Morris Díaz

My mother is from Mexico. That’s the response to the inevitable question posed by anyone who gets to know me.

The question comes in different packages depending on the person asking. “How did you learn Spanish?” “Where are you from?” “What are you?” “Why do you have a Mexican flag hanging from your rear-view mirror?”
 
Growing up I would test out different answers to gauge people’s reaction. “I’m Mexican.” “I’m Mexican-American.” “I’m half Mexican.” “I’m Latina.”

But across the board, the reaction was normally either surprise or confusion.

So, for those who don’t know me: I LOOK white. And, depending on who you ask, I AM white.

I also happen to have a Mexican mother (who recently naturalized!) and a U.S. American father.  I happened to have been born in the United States I happened to have lived in Mexico throughout significant and scattered moments in my life.*

Somewhere along the social construction of the concept of race in the United States, a nationality (Mexican) was conflated with an ethnicity (Latino/Hispanic) and sometimes even a race (brown).
However, for me: whether I’m white passing or actually white are really just spaces that I navigate between rather than existential questions I ask myself.

So to sidestep that issue, my default answer would focus on my mother rather than on me. Also, I felt that being white passing in a way erased my Mexicanness and thereby my mother. However, being white passing/white certainly shaped how I think about race.

An added element was my environment and locations. I grew up in southern Alabama. I even attended a Brown v. Board of Education legacy school still under court mandate to integrate blacks and whites.

But I was neither black nor white, (ok, maybe white-ish).

Because of this, my perception of race came from a kind of peripheral position. An outsider. A foreigner. I realized early on that my mom looked —and was treated— very different than me.

In school, I was friends with mostly international students and fellow children of immigrants. But because of my mixed-race and white appearance positionality, I was also close to a lot of white U.S. Americans.

Being on the side lines yet somehow on Team Hegemony meant that I was able to see first-hand the privilege that came with my whiteness and, in consequence, the unfairness of it to my family and friends.

I think this led me to have such an interest in social sciences, especially topics such as race, identity, equality, migration, justice, and interculturalism.

Progress is slow since my childhood. Fortunately, the U.S. view of race has evolved since that time and my whiteness and Mexicanness don’t seem to confuse people as often anymore.

So now when I answer “my mother is Mexican” I see a sense of relief in my clients, a sense of commonality among peers, a sense of understanding among the immigrant community, and for me a sense of strength in my passion.

*For those interested in the notion of being neither from here nor from there, I recommend the work of Nina Glick Schiller on “transmigrants.” In contrast to the adage ni de aquí ni de allá, Schiller contends that transmigrants are actually from both places simultaneously. 

Categories: 
We Are MIRC

Pages

Subscribe to Michigan Immigrant Rights Center RSS